home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mail
- From: c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: Schildt <- Advanced Books
- Date: 9 Mar 1996 19:42:20 -0800
- Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
- Message-ID: <4htj2sINNjd3@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- References: <8BA8405.02C70020DE.uuout@sourcebbs.com> <4hmqqe$aoo@solutions.solon.com> <3140BAC7.7608@oc.com> <4hsjqe$b91@solutions.solon.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca
-
- In article <4hsjqe$b91@solutions.solon.com>,
- Peter Seebach <seebs@solutions.solon.com> wrote:
- >I don't have it with me, but basically, his claim was based on the fact
- >that there was no explicit prohibition, and that it says main is declared
- >with no prototype. He mentioned testing it on Borland and Microsoft
- >compilers, and was surprised that Borland gave the warning with -A on.
-
- Heh, die-hard empiricist approaching a standardized, well-defined object.
-
- If it works with Borland and Microsoft compilers, by the principle of
- scientific induction it is plausible that it works with all C
- implementations...
-
- --
-
-